不同前处理对动物组织中氯丙嗪残留检测对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

四川省科技厅应用基础研究计划项目( 2016JY0110);农业部农产品质量安全重点实验室开放课题(2018-KF-04)


Detection of chlorpromazine residues in animal tissues by different sample preparation methods
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用超高效液相色谱串联质谱技术,比较QuECHERS法、MCX固相萃取法和叔丁基甲醚直接提取法3种前处理方法对猪肉、猪肝、鸡肉、鱼肉中氯丙嗪残留检测效果的影响。结果表明:3种方法对氯丙嗪的检出限为0.2 μg/kg,定量限为0.5 μg/kg。在不同加标水平下,QuECHERS法、MCX固相萃取法和叔丁基甲醚直接提取法处理的各类基质中加标回收率(75.5%~108.1%)和精密度(2.1%~7.5%)均满足方法学要求。MCX固相萃取法净化效果优于QuECHERS法、叔丁基甲醚直接提取法。整体回收率从高到低依次是MCX固相萃取法、QuECHERS法、叔丁基甲醚直接提取法。对于脂肪含量较高的猪肉,3种前处理方法回收率均略低于其他3种基质。

    Abstract:

    Ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrum/ mass spectrum (UPLC-MS/MS) was used to detect chlorpromazine residue in porcine muscle, liver, chicken and fish. Three sample preparation methods, including QuECHERS, MCX solid-phase extraction, and direct extraction by tert-butyl methyl ether, were compared. The results showed that the limit of detection (LOD) of the three methods for chlorpromazine was 0.2 μg/kg, and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 0.5 μg/kg. The recovery and relative standard deviation (RSD) of the three sample preparation methods at different addition levels were 75.5%~108.1% and 2.1%~7.5%, respectively. The detection limit, recovery, and RSD meet the methodological requirements. The purifying effect of MCX solid-phase extraction was better than the other sample preparation methods. The order of recovery was as follows: MCX solid-phase extraction, QuECHERS, and direct extraction by tert-butyl methyl ether. The recoveries of all the three methods for porcine muscle were lower than that for liver, chicken and fish.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张文.不同前处理对动物组织中氯丙嗪残留检测对比[J].精细化工,2019,36(8):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-21
  • 最后修改日期:2019-05-07
  • 录用日期:2019-05-08
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-10
  • 出版日期: