Comparative Research of Different Methods for Quantitative Analysis of Flavor Components in Wine
DOI:
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The advantages and disadvantages of three kinds of methods such as vacuum distillation-GC, activated carbon adsorption-GC, and HS-GC for quantitative analysis of flavor components in wine were compared in this paper. The experimental results have shown that activated carbon adsorption-GC is proper for detecting acetaldehyde and n-butyl alcohol in wine; vacuum distillation-GC, activated carbon adsorption-GC analysis are fit for measuring n-propyl alcohol and isoamyl alcohol. Besides, it is simple and convenient for analyzing acetic ether, ethyl lactate and methanol by HS-GC. Furthermore, acetic acid and glycerine are suitable for vacuum distillation-GC and activated carbon adsorption-GC analysis, respectively. Due to its moderate boiling point and viscosity, isobutanol can be measured by all three methods. The above conclusions can supply a good reference for later analytical work for flavor components in wine.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:July 05,2010
  • Revised:August 23,2010
  • Adopted:September 01,2010
  • Online: October 18,2010
  • Published:
Article QR Code