Detection of chlorpromazine residues in animal tissues by different sample preparation methods
DOI:
CSTR:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrum/ mass spectrum (UPLC-MS/MS) was used to detect chlorpromazine residue in porcine muscle, liver, chicken and fish. Three sample preparation methods, including QuECHERS, MCX solid-phase extraction, and direct extraction by tert-butyl methyl ether, were compared. The results showed that the limit of detection (LOD) of the three methods for chlorpromazine was 0.2 μg/kg, and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 0.5 μg/kg. The recovery and relative standard deviation (RSD) of the three sample preparation methods at different addition levels were 75.5%~108.1% and 2.1%~7.5%, respectively. The detection limit, recovery, and RSD meet the methodological requirements. The purifying effect of MCX solid-phase extraction was better than the other sample preparation methods. The order of recovery was as follows: MCX solid-phase extraction, QuECHERS, and direct extraction by tert-butyl methyl ether. The recoveries of all the three methods for porcine muscle were lower than that for liver, chicken and fish.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:March 21,2019
  • Revised:May 07,2019
  • Adopted:May 08,2019
  • Online: July 10,2019
  • Published:
Article QR Code