Page 26 - 201905
P. 26

·794·                             精细化工   FINE CHEMICALS                                  第 36 卷

                 model  for  ultrafiltration  membrane  processes[J].  Computer  Aided   of Membrane Science, 2006, 276(1): 162-167.
                 Process Engineering, 2017, 40: 193-198.       [42]  Bayramoğlu G, Yalçin E, Arica M Y. Adsorption of serum albumin
            [24]  Esfahani M R, Stretz H A, Wells M J M. Comparing humic acid and   and γ-globulin from single and binary mixture and characterization of
                 protein fouling on polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes: Adsorption   pHEMA-based  affinity  membrane  surface  by  contact  angle
                 and reversibility[J]. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2015, 6:   measurements[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 26(1): 12-
                 83-92.                                            21.
            [25]  Krstić D M,  Antov  M  G, Peričin D M,  et al.  The  possibility  for   [43]  Nguyen  T,  Roddick  F  A,  Fan  L.  Biofouling  of  water  treatment
                 improvement  of  ceramic  membrane  ultrafiltration  of  an  enzyme   membranes: a review of the underlying causes, monitoring techniques
                 solution[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 33(1): 10-15.   and control measures [J]. Membranes, 2012, 2(4): 804-840.
            [26]  Min  Zhaosheng  (闵兆升), Guo  Huimin (郭会明),  Zhang  Qingwen   [44]  Kumar R, Ismail A F. Fouling control on microfiltration/ultrafiltration
                 (张庆文), et al. The application of membrane separation technology   membranes:  effects  of  morphology,  hydrophilicity,  and  charge[J].
                 in concentration process of enzyme solution[J]. Food and Fermentation   Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2015, 132(21): 42042-42062.
                 Industries (食品与发酵工业), 2013, 39(5): 138-142.   [45]  Liu H B (刘红波).  Studies  about  the  effect  of  membrane  modules
            [27]  Lee  J,  Jeong  S,  Ye  Y,  et al.  Protein  fouling  in  carbon  nanotubes   onfiltration  process  of  Chinese  herbal  decoctions  and  Sub-critical
                 enhanced ultrafiltration membrane: Fouling mechanism as a function   flux  operation  optimization[D].  Nanjing:  Nanjing  University  of
                 of  pH  and  ionic  strength[J].  Separation  &  Purification  Technology,   Chinese Medicine, 2013.
                 2017, 176: 323-334.                           [46]  Bhattacharjee C, Saxena V K, Dutta S. Fruit juice processing using
            [28]  Nor M Z M, Ramchandran L, Duke M, et al. Separation of bromelain   membrane  technology:  A  review[J].  Innovative  Food  Science  &
                 from  crude  pineapple  waste  mixture  by  a  two-stage  ceramic   Emerging Technologies, 2017, 43: 136-152.
                 ultrafiltration process[J]. Food & Bioproducts Processing, 2016, 98:   [47]  Schwarze  M.  Micellar-enhanced  ultrafiltration  (MEUF)-state of  the
                 142-150.                                          art[J]. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2017,
            [29]  Salgin S, Takaç S, Ozdamar T H. Effect of ionic environments on the   3(4): 598-624.
                 adsorption  and  diffusion  characteristics  of  serine  alkaline  protease   [48]  Li Zhenyu, Wirote Youravong, Aran H-Kittikun. Separation of proteases
                 enzyme in polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Journal of   from yellow fin tuna spleen by ultrafiltration[J]. Bioresource Technology,
                 Colloid & Interface Science, 2006, 299(2): 806-814.   2006, 97(18): 2364-2370.
            [30]  Yingpei  L,  Mohammad  A  W.  Effect  of  solution  chemistry  on  flux   [49]  Hebbar  U  H,  Sumana  B,  Hemavathi  A  B,  et al.  separation  and
                 decline  during  high  concentration  protein  ultrafiltration  through  a   purification  of  bromelain  by  reverse  micellar  extraction  coupled
                 hydrophilic  membrane[J].  Chemical  Engineering  Journal,  2010,   ultrafiltration and comparative studies with other methods[J]. Food &
                 159(1): 91-97.                                    Bioprocess Technology, 2012, 5(3): 1010-1018.
            [31]  Wang Y N, Tang C Y. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and   [50]  Zhang  W,  Ding  L.  Investigation  of  membrane  fouling  mechanisms
                 ultrafiltration  membranes  by  protein  mixtures:  the  role  of  inter-   using  blocking  models  in  the  case  of  shear-enhanced  ultrafiltration
                 foulant-species interaction[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,   [J]. Separation & Purification Technology, 2015, 141: 160-169.
                 2011, 45(15): 6373-6379.                      [51]  Zhang W, Zhu Z, Jaffrin M Y, et al. Effects of hydraulic conditions
            [32]  Lu J, Wan Yinhua, Cui Z. Fractionation of lysozyme and chicken egg   on  effluent  quality,  flux  behavior,  and  energy  consumption  in  a
                 albumin using ultrafiltration with 30-kda commercial membranes [J].   shear-enhanced  membrane  filtration  using  box-behnken  response
                 Industrial  &  Engineering  Chemistry  Research,  2005,  20(44):   surface methodology[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,
                 7610-7616.                                        2014, 53(17): 7176-7185.
            [33]  Chan R, Chen V. The effects of electrolyte concentration and pH on   [52]  Cancinomadariaga  B,  Ruby  R,  Castro  C  A,  et al.  Analysis  of  the
                 protein  aggregation  and  deposition:  critical  flux  and  constant  flux   membrane  fouling  mechanisms  involved  in  clarified  grape  juice
                 membrane filtration [J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2001, 185(2):   ultrafiltration  using  statistical  tools[J].  Industrial  &  Engineering
                 177-192.                                          Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(10): 4017-4024.
            [34]  She  Q  H,  Tang  C  Y,  Wang  Y  N,  et al.  The  role  of  hydrodynamic   [53]  Yang X, Zhou S, Li M, et al. Purification of cellulase fermentation
                 conditions  and  solution  chemistry  on  protein  fouling  during   broth via low cost ceramic microfiltration membranes with nanofibers-
                 ultrafiltration[J]. Desalination, 2009, 249(3): 1079-1087.   like  attapulgite  separation  layers[J].  Separation  &  Purification
            [35]  Rui M, Lei W, Miao Z, et al. Effect of hydration forces on protein   Technology, 2017, 175: 435-442.
                 fouling  of  ultrafiltration  membranes:  the  role  of  protein  charge,   [54]  Rodríguez-Fernández  D  E,  Parada  J  L,  Medeiros  A  B  P,  et al.
                 hydrated ion species and membrane hydrophilicity[J]. Environmental   Concentration by ultrafiltration and stabilization of phytase produced
                 Science & Technology, 2017, 51(1): 167-174.       by  solid-state  fermentation[J].  Process  Biochemistry,  2013,  48(2):
            [36]  Zhou  R,  Ren  P  F,  Yang  H  C,  et al.  Fabrication  of  antifouling   374-379.
                 membrane surface by poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate)/polydopamine   [55]  Vanangamudi A, Dumée L F, Duke M C, et al. Nanofiber composite
                 co-deposition[J].  Journal  of  Membrane  Science,  2014,  466(18):   membrane  with  intrinsic  janus  surface  for  reversed-protein-fouling
                 18-25.                                            ultrafiltration[J].  Acs  Applied  Materials  &  Interfaces,  2017,  9(21):
            [37]  Liu Y, Ma C, Wang S, et al. Fabrication and performance study of a   18328-18337.
                 zwitterionic  polyimide  antifouling  ultrafiltration  membrane[J]. Rsc   [56]  Zhao S, Wang Z, Wang J, et al. The effect of pH of coagulation bath
                 Advances, 2015, 5(27): 21316-21325.               on  tailoring  the  morphology  and  separation  performance  of
            [38]  Chen  S,  Li  L,  Zhao  C,  et al.  Surface  hydration:  Principles  and   polysulfone/polyaniline  ultrafiltration  membrane[J].  Journal  of
                 applications toward low-fouling/nonfouling biomaterials[J]. Polymer,   Membrane Science, 2014, 469: 316-325.
                 2010, 51(23): 5283-5293.                      [57]  Loh  C  H,  Wang  R,  Shi  L,  et al.  Fabrication  of  high  performance
            [39]  Damar  I  H,  Gulec  H  A.  Fouling  behavior  of  poly  (ether)  sulfone   polyethersulfone  UF  hollow  fiber  membranes  using  amphiphilic
                 ultrafiltration  membrane  during  concentration  of  whey  proteins:   Pluronic block copolymers  as pore-forming additives[J]. Journal of
                 Effect of hydrophilic modification using atmospheric pressure argon   membrane Science, 2011, 380(1/2): 114-123.
                 jet plasma[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2017, 160: 510-519.   [58]  Mendes G, Faria M, Carvalho A, et al. Structure of water in hybrid
            [40]  Pal S, Ghatak S K, De S, et al. Evaluation of surface roughness of a   cellulose  acetate-silica  ultrafiltration  membranes  and  permeation
                 plasma  treated  polymeric  membrane  by  wavelet  analysis  and   properties [J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2018, 189(1): 342-351.
                 quantification  of  its  enhanced  performance[J].  Applied  Surface   [59]  Lohokare  H,  Bhole  Y,  Taralkar  S,  et al.  Poly  (acrylonitrile)  based
                 Science, 2008, 255(5): 2504-2511.                 ultrafiltration  membranes:  Optimization  of  preparation  parameters
            [41]  Lu Y, Yu S L, Chai B X, et al. Effect of nano-sized Al 2O 3 -particle   [J]. Desalination, 2011, 282(21): 46-53.
                 addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance[J]. Journal   [60]  Almasian A, Giyahi M, ChizariFard G, et al. Removal of heavy metal
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31