Page 174 - 《精细化工》2023年第2期
P. 174
·396· 精细化工 FINE CHEMICALS 第 40 卷
表 1 含 MOFs 纳米颗粒的 SRNF 膜性能对比
Table 1 Properties comparison of SRNF membranes containing MOFs nanoparticles
2
纳米颗粒 基膜 溶剂类型 甲醇通量/[L/(m ·h·MPa)] 溶质(相对分子质量) 截留率/% 参考文献
UiO-66 PEI 甲醇 48 CR(696.7) 93.2 本文
ZIF-8 PI 甲醇 21 PS(236) 99.5 [29]
MIL-53(Al) PI 甲醇 19 PS(236) 99.9 [29]
NH 2-MIL-53(Al) PI 甲醇 18 PS(236) 99.8 [29]
MIL-101(Cr) PI 甲醇 39 PS(236) 98.5 [29]
MIL-68 PI 甲醇 44 SY(452.4) 93.8 [30]
ZIF-11 PI 甲醇 62 SY(452.4) 91.5 [31]
ZIF-8 PPSU 甲醇 33 MR(269.3) 86.2 [31]
ZIF-8 PI 甲醇 87 SY(452.4) 90.0 [32]
ZIF-67 PI 甲醇 48 SY(452.4) 79.3 [32]
注:PI 为聚酰亚胺;PPSU 为聚苯砜;PS 为聚苯乙烯;CR 为刚果红;SY 为日落黄;MR 为甲基红。
3 结论 permeation property of thin film nanocomposite membrane by
functionalized inorganic nanospheres for solvent resistant nanofiltration
[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 165: 60-70.
通过在 PEI 基膜上引入 PDA-UiO-66 纳米复合
[8] SOLOMON M F J, BHOLE Y, LIVINGSTON A G. High flux
中间层,再在中间层上界面聚合制备了具有增强的 hydrophobic membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)-
纳滤性能和结构稳定性的 SRNF 膜。当 UiO-66 分散 Interfacial polymerization, surface modification and solvent activation
[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 434: 193-203.
液质量浓度为 0.2 g/L 时,TFN-U 2 膜水通量为 63.83 [9] WANG Y, LI X, ZHAO S, et al. Thin-film composite membrane
2
2
L/(m ·h),甲醇通量为 28.50 L/(m ·h),且对刚果红水 with interlayer decorated metal-organic framework UiO-66 toward
溶液和刚果红甲醇溶液的截留率为 98.2%和 93.2%, enhanced forward osmosis performance[J]. Industrial & Engineering
Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(1): 195-206.
纯水通量较 PA/PEI 膜相比提高了 1 倍多,同时该膜 [10] LI C, LI S, TIAN L, et al. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs)-
在耐污染测试中具有良好的性能,通量恢复率达 incorporated thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes for high-
flux organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN)[J]. Journal of Membrane
78.1%,且制备的 TFN-U 2 SRNF 膜经过无水乙醇、
Science, 2019, 572: 520-531.
丙酮、乙酸乙酯、正己烷以及 DMF 等有机溶剂浸泡 [11] WANG F, ZHENG T, XIONG R, et al. Strong improvement of
48 h 后,仍表现出很稳定的分离性能。 reverse osmosis polyamide membrane performance by addition of
ZIF-8 nanoparticles: Effect of particle size and dispersion in selective
参考文献: layer[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 233: 524-531.
[12] GUO X, LIU D, HAN T, et al. Preparation of thin film nanocomposite
[1] DAI J, LI S, LIU J, et al. Fabrication and characterization of a membranes with surface modified MOF for high flux organic solvent
defect-free mixed matrix membrane by facile mixing PPSU with nanofiltration[J]. AICHE Journal, 2017, 63(4): 1303-1312.
ZIF-8 core-shell microspheres for solvent-resistant nanofiltration[J]. [13] WEN Y, ZHANG X, LI X, et al. Metal-organic framework nanosheets
Journal of Membrane Science, 2019, 589: 117261. for thin-film composite membranes with enhanced permeability and
[2] DARVISHMANESH S, FIROOZPOUR L, VANNESTE J, et al. selectivity[J]. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2020, 3(9): 9238-9248.
Performance of solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes for purification [14] DAI R, LI J, WANG Z. Constructing interlayer to tailor structure and
of residual solvent in the pharmaceutical industry: Experiments and performance of thin-film composite polyamide membranes: A review
simulation[J]. Green Chemistry, 2011, 13(12): 3476-3483. [J]. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2020, 282: 102204.
[3] HENDRIX K, VANDOORNE S, KOECKELBERGHS G, et al. [15] CHEN L, REN X, LI Y, et al. Enhancing interface compatibility of
SRNF membranes for edible oil purification: Introducing free amines UiO-66-NH 2 and polyamide by incorporating dopamine into thin
in crosslinked PEEK to increase membrane hydrophilicity[J]. Polymer, film nanocomposite membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science,
2014, 55(6): 1307-1316. 2022, 654: 120565.
[4] CANO-ODENA A, VANDEZANDE P, FOURNIER D, et al. Solvent- [16] BAO Y Q (包亚晴), HUANG L J H (黄李金鸿), LI X D (李新冬),
resistant nanofiltration for product purification and catalyst recovery et al. Preparation of positively charged nanofiltration membrane
in click chemistry reactions[J]. Chemistry-A European Journal, 2010, regulated by PDA interlayer and its application in water treatment
16(3): 1061-1067. [J]. Materials Reports (材料导报), 2023, (6): 1-12.
[5] MARCHETTI P, PEEVA L, LIVINGSTON A. The selectivity challenge [17] AHMADIPOUYA S, MOUSAVI S A, SHOKRGOZAR A, et al.
in organic solvent nanofiltration: Membrane and process solutions[J]. Improving dye removal and antifouling performance of polysulfone
Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2017, 8: nanofiltration membranes by incorporation of UiO-66 metal-organic
473-497. framework[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022,
[6] SUN S, CHUNG T, LU K, et al. Enhancement of flux and solvent 10(3): 107535.
stability of matrimidvr thin-film composite membranes for organic [18] YANG F (杨帆). Functional modification of PVDF membrane by
solvent nanofiltration[J]. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, g-C 3N 4 and UiO-66 and performance of this composite membrane
2014, 60(10): 3623-3633. [D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University (北京交通大学), 2020.
[7] LI Y, MAO H, ZHANG H, et al. Tuning the microstructure and [19] OUYANG G Z (欧阳果仔), LI X D (李新冬), ZHANG X (张鑫), et