Page 18 - 《精细化工》2021年第1期

·8· 精细化工 FINE CHEMICALS 第 38 卷

generation in continuous flow air-cathode stacked microbial fuel cell: [35] TOUACH N, ORTIZ-MARTÍNEZ V M, SALAR-GARCÍA M J, et
Effect of series and parallel configuration[J]. Journal of Environmental al. Influence of the preparation method of MnO 2-based cathodes on
Management, 2018, 214: 232-241. the performance of single-chamber MFCs using wastewater[J].
[16] ZHANG M, MA Z K, ZHAO N, et al. Increased power generation Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 171: 174-181.
from cylindrical microbial fuel cell inoculated with P. aeruginosa[J]. [36] ZHENG W, CAI T, HUANG M H, et al. Comparison of
Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2019, 141: 111394-111399. electrochemical performances and microbial community structures of
[17] PETER F, JENS G, NORMAN K, et al. Electricity generation in a two photosynthetic microbial fuel cells[J]. Journal of Bioscience and
microbial fuel cell with textile carbon fibre anodes[J]. Computers and Bioengineering, 2017, 124(5): 551-558.
Mathematics with Applications, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2019. [37] ZHANG L F, FU G K, ZHANG Z. Simultaneous nutrient and carbon
11.019. removal and electricity generation in self-buffered biocathode microbial
[18] JOHANNA H, PAOLO D, PRITHA C, et al. Effects of anode fuel cell for high-salinity mustard tuber wastewater treatment[J].
materials on electricity production from xylose and treatability of Bioresource Technology, 2018, 272: 105-113.
TMP wastewater in an up-flow microbial fuel cell[J]. Chemical [38] ROSSI R, YANG W L, ZIKMUND E, et al. In situ biofilm removal
Engineering Journal, 2019, 372: 141-150. from air cathodes in microbial fuel cells treating domestic wastewater[J].
[19] JIN H W (靳宏伟), ZHAI D D (翟丹丹), WANG X (王心), et al. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 265: 200-206.
Effect of graphene/polyaniline modified anode on performance of [39] ZHANG E R, WANG F, YU Q L, et al. Durability and regeneration
microbial fuel cell[J]. CIESC Journal (化工学报), 2019, 70(6): of activated carbon air-cathodes in long-term operated microbial fuel
2343-2350. cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 360: 21-27.
[20] HE F (何凡), HU Y Y (胡蕴仪), HUANG X J (黄秀静), et al. [40] MA M, YOU S J, GONG X B, et al. Silver/iron oxide/graphitic
Comparative study on electrical characteristics of microbial fuel cells carbon composites as bacteriostatic catalysts for enhancing oxygen
using carbon paper and carbon cloth electrodes[J]. Modern Chemical reduction in microbial fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2015,
Industry (现代化工), 2019, 39(1): 184-187. 283: 74-83.
[21] HUANG X (黄霞), FAN M Z (范明志), LIANG P (梁鹏), et al. [41] LIAN J, SUN Y J, LI H C, et al. Influencing factors of electricity
Influence of anodic characters of microbial fuel cell on power production from sewage sludge by two-chamber microbial fuel
generation performance[J]. China Water & Wastewater (中国给水排 cell[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(10):
水), 2007, 23(3): 8-13. 4515-4520.
[22] VIGNESH A, CAMILA C DE B, GOURAV D B, et al. Microbial fuel [42] GHANGREKAR M M, SHINDE V B. Performance of membrane-
cell performance of graphitic carbon functionalized porous polysiloxane less microbial fuel cell treating wastewater and effect of electrode
based ceramic membranes[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2019, 129: 259-269. distance and area on electricity production[J]. Bioresource Technology,
[23] MOHAMED H O, OBAID M, SAYED E T, et al. Graphite sheets as 2007, 98(15): 2879-2885.
high-performance low-cost anodes for microbial fuel cells using real [43] MAHMOUD M S, WEN B, SU Z H, et al. Parameters influencing
food wastewater[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2017, 40(12): power generation in eco-friendly microbial fuel cells[J]. Paper and
2243-2250. Biomaterials, 2018, 3(1): 10-16.
[24] LI X, HU M H, ZENG L Z, et al. Co-modified MoO 2 nanoparticles [44] LIU Z D, LIU J, ZHANG S P, et al. Study of operational performance
highly dispersed on N-doped carbon nanorods as anode electrocatalyst and electrical response on mediator-less microbial fuel cells fed with
of microbial fuel cells[J]. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 2019, 145: carbon- and protein-rich substrates[J]. Biochemical Engineering
111727-111734. Journal, 2009, 45(3): 185-191.
[25] KIM H, KIM B, YU J. Effect of HRT and external resistances on [45] EBADINEZHAD B, EBRAHIMI S, SHOKRKAR H. Evaluation of
power generation of sidestream microbial fuel cell with CNT-coated microbial fuel cell performance utilizing sequential batch feeding of
SSM anode treating actual fermentation filtrate of municipal sludge[J]. different substrates[J]. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2019,
The Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 675: 390-396. 836: 149-157.
[26] DIANA H, TONIA T, SERGIO B, et al. Surface modification of [46] LIU C M, LIU L, XU B, et al. Effects of inlet substrate and buffer
commercial carbon felt used as anode for microbial fuel cells[J]. concentrations on MFC performance[J]. Environmental Science &
Energy, 2016, 99: 193-201. Technology, 2015, 38(2): 48-51.
[27] GEETANJALI, RADHA R, DEEPAMALA S, et al. Optimization of [47] RYAN C T, KIM Y. Influence of substrate concentration and feed
operating conditions of miniaturize single chambered microbial fuel frequency on ammonia inhibition in microbial fuel cells[J]. Journal
cell using NiWO 4/graphene oxide modified anode for performance of Power Sources, 2014, 271: 360-365.
improvement and microbial communities dynamics[J]. Bioresource [48] SMITA S K, VIVEK K, SANDEEP K M, et al. Microbial fuel cells
Technology, 2019, 285: 121337-121348. (MFCs) for bioelectrochemical treatment of different wastewater
[28] GUO W, CUI Y R, SONG H, et al. Layer-by-layer construction of streams[J]. Fuel, 2019, 254: 115526-115542.
graphene-based microbial fuel cell for improved power generation [49] JADHAV G S, GHANGREKAR M M. Performance of microbial
and methyl orange removal[J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, temperature, external load and
2014, 37(9): 1749-1758. substrate concentration[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100: 717-723.
[29] CHENG S A, WU J C. Air-cathode preparation with activated carbon [50] YUAN Y, ZHAO B, ZHOU S G, et al. Electrocatalytic activity of
as catalyst, PTFE as binder and nickel foam as current collector for anodic biofilm responses to pH changes in microbial fuel cells[J].
microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2013, 92: 22-26. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(13): 6887-6891.
[30] ZHANG Y P, SUN J, HU Y Y, et al. Bio-cathode materials evaluation [51] YANG N, REN Y P, LI X F, et al. Effect of short-term alkaline
in microbial fuel cells: A comparison of graphite felt, carbon paper intervention on the performance of buffer-free single-chamber
and stainless steel mesh materials[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen microbial fuel cell[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2017, 115: 41-46.
Energy, 2012, 37(22): 16935-16942. [52] YONGTAE A, BRUCE E L. Saline catholytes as alternatives to
[31] CHEN W W, LIU Z L, LI Y X, et al. A novel stainless steel fiber phosphate buffers in microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioresource Technology,
felt/Pd nanocatalysts electrode for efficient ORR in air-cathode 2013, 132: 436-439.
microbial fuel cells[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2019, 324: 134862-134871. [53] FENG K, TANG B B, WU P Y. Sulfonated graphene oxide-silica for
[32] MOSTAFA R, ARASH A, SOHEIL D, et al. Microbial fuel cell as highly selective Nafion-based proton exchange membranes[J]. Journal
new technology for bioelectricity generation: A review[J]. Alexandria of Materials Chemistry A, 2014, 2(38): 16083-16092.
Engineering Journal, 2015, 54(3): 745-756. [54] HERNÁNDEZ-FLORES G, POGGI-VARALDO H M, SOLORZA-
[33] WANG D L, MA Z K, XIE Y E, et al. Characterization of FERIA O, et al. Batch operation of a microbial fuel cell equipped
Fe/N-doped grapheneasair-cathodecatalystin microbial fuel cells[J]. with alternative proton exchange membrane[J]. International Journal
Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2017, 26(6): 1187-1195. of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(48): 17323-17331.
[34] CHOI Y J, MOHAMED H O, PARK S G, et al. Electrophoretically [55] XU Q B, WANG L, LI C, et al. Study on improvement of the proton
fabricated nickel/nickel oxides as cost effective nanocatalysts for the conductivity and anti-fouling of proton exchange membrane by
oxygen reduction reaction in air-cathode microbial fuel cell[J]. doping SGO@SiO 2 in microbial fuel cell applications[J]. International
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(10): 5960-5970. Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(29): 15322-15332.